Labour with Care

Since my last post Accepting Inefficiencies I've been looking at and thinking about the State-of-Unorganized-Labour in India. Phenomena like the breaking down of communities, unraveling of the social fabric etc were vague concepts in the past. Now they are staring at me every day.

Many people like Fr.V told me about the life of labourers that they had observered when they were young: the labourers got little pay, yet all their needs were met - primarily by the community around them who considered it as their duty to help these service providers. Farm workers, barbers, washers, health care workers (human and vetinerary), masons, plumbers, carpenters, sanitory workers, even teachers and priests - all felt cared for. They never ran out of food, clothing and shelter. They never had to feel ashamed and beg for resources needed during resource heavy life situations (births, deaths, weddings etc). Though they were not treated as equals or had much choice in who they worked for, they were very much part of the community and received financial and emotional social security. And that helped them do their work with dedication. Overall, they seldom let their clients/masters down and vice versa. At least in the region of India I grew up, feudalism had given way to a reationship of always-on mutual care.

Starting with my Dad's generation, people have started mediating all values through money. A labourer could grab another's work by cutting down the price. A worker's pay was cut if he could not work for the agreed number of hours due to some personal constraint. After a while, all that the employers cared for was only their money's worth of labour. And all that the employees cared for was only their labour's worth of money. Since money cannot represent virtues like trust, loyalty, work-ethic, honesty, quality etc, the employers could not buy them. Since money does not compensate for virtues, the employees did not sell them. The result is, over the last 40 years, employers have reduced their expression of care for their labourers - not because they do not want to but because they have chosen the wrong medium to show it. In turn, labourers have become indifferent to their work, their employers and even to themselves and their families.

Around 25 farm workers planted about 8000 trees in our farm. I do not know the names of 20 of them. I did not sit with them in a circle and inquire about their life, their families and their well being. I did not even introduce myself to many of them. I bought their service with cash. I had a strictly professional relationship with them which ended when they left my farm. I had done exactly what everyone else has been doing. I deserve what I got (or not) for the money.

We did a little better with our construction workers. We bought their medicines, hats, slippers, gloves, practiced yoga together, shared farm produce, celebrated festivals together, happily became their assistants every now and then and gave them days off to watch movies. They valued these perks, yet they could not break out of their inertia and embrace forgotten virtues. Used to being reduced to a commodity in the market, they behaved accordingly when demand peaked.

It seems like one can no longer buy any service in India from unorganized labourers. Each labourer offers a product whose features and characteristics cannot be discerned immediately. Once you have bought a labourer's work, it is very hard to improve or change anything as he is only offering a self-standardized product. It is their way of responding to a society in which the money they hold in their hands is their only security. Just one employer showing some care isn't going to cut it. In fact, the care was seen with suspicion by most.

So, we are determined to break out of professional relationships with anyone whose product or service we seek. We would like to invite them in our lives with all their aspirations and worries. We'd like to establish a realtionship with them based on care and service that goes beyond the value of their service to us. We have attempted this in the last year and some of it happens naturally. And we've been exploited quite a few times. But the struggle seems to be worth it.

To anyone who interested, please send us ideas that could help us change this transactional game into one that creates a community.  If possible, send us lists of rituals, practices and rules that we could engage in that helps the process.

Examples:

Ritual:
Always create a sense of a good beginning for any work. "Well begun is half done" as the saying goes. So I want to sit with the worker(s) and do a mutual introduction, talk about why I am doing something for which I need their help, share some useful/inspiring stories and show gratitude in words or gifts.

Practice: Treat the worker as if he is a volunteer gifting his service.

Rule: Whenever there is any difficulty, communicate clearly and firmly and with a lot of respect.

Update: Our construction team came back just in time before the rains. And they completed the 'very difficult sir' task of giving a thin concrete coating over sloping bamboo roofs quite effortlessly. We hope they'll stay to finish.

Comments

Dear Raghu,I started reading

Dear Raghu,

I started reading your blogs of late and like them. I am sure to benefit from reading abuot your experiences. I also wanted to share with you some of my experiences in helping the needy. A neighbour to our farm had  built a hut at Rs.12,000 (with mud walls and thatch roofs - it is a very neat hut). She had taken a loan for the amount and was paying 1200 per month as interest.  I gave her the whole amount and asked her to repay as 500 per month over 2 years. She never paid me even once, used the money I gave her to buy her drunkard husband a tractor by taking additional loans and is deeper in debt now. I realized that some people cannot handle large sums and need to be helped in ways they understand.

Subsequently, a construction worker in my area came to me asking for help. She wanted 50,000 to repay a high interest loan she had. Her husband had just passed away and she had three young children. The loan was taken by mortgaging a 4 cent plot she had, and she could not sustain payments.

I took her to my bank, and after consultation with the manager who was very helpful, deposited 60,000 rupees as a fixed deposit which was the bank guarantee for the loan. They gave her a loan of 50,000 against my guarantee. She had to pay only Rs.700 a month for 10 years; but she  manages Rs.1000 and hopes to finish the loan sooner. I am greatly encouraged by her cheerfulness. Handing the money to her might not have helped her self-esteem. She enjoys being a customer at the bank. 

I have also done the same thing for my house-maid. My bank gave her a housing loan for 1,50,000 against a fixed deposit I made for the same amount. The deposit will remain with the bank for 15 years, and would have built to a good value which can be given to her as retirement benefit. She, her 2 working daughters and husband have no hassles paying the mortgage of Rs.1700 per month.

I hope this is of some help.

Sathya.

Keys to Improving? farm labour...

The SHG idea sounds very interesting - especially in the context of the alternative, which is trying to establish standards and a philosophy of professionalism externally and inorganically (as Raghu said this is not easy). We are hoping that an agricultural services SHG that provides 'clients' with reliable, skilled and timely workforce while providing 'employees' with regular employment and 'good' terms/benefits will help address the issues that we've seen with labour shortages in Chorao.

The idea is to build up capacity/scale to increase our capacity to attract and compensate labour and then use the 'pre-purchased' capacity to increase efficiency for member farmers. Spare 'capacity' can be rented out to other farmers in the area. Lets see how this goes when we try and set it up for next year...

Labour Acceptance

Hi Raghu,

I have gone through all your blogs and I think that you have almost nailed it.  Before I start expressing my ideas, I will have to warn you that I don't have any farming experience in which I have been involved directly.  My thoughts are based on what I have seen my parents (nor were they farmers) doing inorder to increase the community acceptance and in general for the betterment of the lesser privileged around us. 

One that I have found useful to us, both directly and indirectly was attending to their financial needs with the help of interest free loans.  For you to do this, you will have to get involved in the daily lives more closely than what level you are probably at.  I am not talking about huge amount of money here.  I think an example will help me to express what I am trying to say.  We had this fisherman in our locality, whose wife used to help my mother in her daily chores.  This fisherman doesn't actually catch the fish, but buys from the whole sale market and sells the fish in the retail market.  Before we started giving him money (Rs. 1000 for a day or two), he used to borrow from the local pawn broker at a hefty interest of Rs. 100 per day for Rs.1000.  The profit anyone could make was very less with such a huge interest.  Even if he makes some, it was not enough for that fisherman to come out of the clutches of the pawn broker.  My father use to give him money in the morning (whenever, he needed it - he would only ask 4 or 5 times a month) and he used to return it in the evening with a lot of relief that he didn't have to pay 100 Rupees from his hard earned money to the pawn broker. 

A practical difficulty to implement this, however is in the repayment of the loan.  I know of a charitable trust in the same area, wherein they provide interest free loans (upto a maximum of Rs. 3500) to fisherman, farmers, petty shop owners, etc.  The society runs this at a larger scale and they help 30 to 50 people a month.  One of the striking tactic they use here is they always involve the spouse.  So if a man was in need of money, they will only give the money in the presence of his wife.  Also, if a person was borrowing to fill the stock in his small shop, the society will order the goods and pay the wholesale dealers directly, rather than handing over the money to borrower. I have heard that this have kept their NPA at almost 0. 

Hope this helps!

Labour with Care

Hi Naveej,
Thanx for the good suggestions. The charitable trust model is neat. Can you let us know the name of the trust?
We tried to do something similar. When the lady who helps with our farm was evicted, she asked for a loan to put up a new shelter. Instead, Nisha got  the materials and arranged for construction workers to build a new thatch structure. Since we had a direct stake, we were automatically drawn to supervising the construction which resulted in a good quality roof above her head. Merely handing out 3000 Rupees would have been a very different experience for both parties.

Hi Raghu,Glad to see your

Hi Raghu,

Glad to see your reply.  The trust is called MARWA and operates out from a coastal village town, where I am from - ERIYAD in Thrissur district.



hi raghu:This is my first

hi raghu:

This is my first visit to your blog. Its good.

From my experience in dealing with farm labourers and village community, you have to become a "mass leader" to win their hearts. Its a very long patient journey.

My suggestions:

1) To deal with labourers efficiently, you can try "Self Help Groups (SHG)" model and outsource the entire farm labour job to this SHG. SHG will be run by a group leader (from the village), who is fit for the job. Initially (when you are perceived that you are an alien), you can interact with the group leader and specify the job tasks and your expectations of job quality. Farm labourers always have some loyalty towards a person leading them from their own village. Slowly in the later stages, you can get directly involved with the SHG members and create a relationship. I think this way you can break the ice easily.

One more thing, if your village location is very close to an urban center, most of the villagers prefer construction work in the city compared to farm jobs in village. In the long term, once the sense of community and good life in village is appreciated by the villagers, they will prefer farm work in their own villages.

This approach is from bottom to top.

2) In order to build a sense of community in villages, the key task is handling village politics and problems. Most of these villagers will be facing lot of basic problems (hygiene, health, housing etc) and at the same time struggling to find work on a daily basis. These daily labourers are the most vulnerable people to the money lenders, who lend money at huge interest rates. The most important thing on the mind of a labourer is how to maximize his daily wages in order to take care of his daily living expenses and financial interest payments.

You have to think like a mass leader, and solve their basic and economic problems. Even if you succeed at solving atleast one of their problems, they will start trusting you. Once you win their trust, you can do things your way. In solving these problems, you need to build relationships with the local village heads too. This approach is from top to bottom.

The big irony is, villages are the most politically active regions and at the same time no one leader is really present in villages to solve their daily basic problems. You need to implement both the above approaches simultaneously to win the hearts of the villagers.

I personally think village life is full of challanges and lots of fun, but I love it. Excuse me for this long reply but I couldn't resist sharing my experiences with you.

 

 

 

 

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Image CAPTCHA
Enter the characters (without spaces) shown in the image.